Skip to main content

Russia-Ukraine war: Economic power is the West's best weapon against Putin

Russia's onslaught has been anticipated for months

Vladimir Putin has done it. Ignoring near-universal condemnation, the Russian president has launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, confirming the West’s worst fears. It’s an abominable act of unprovoked aggression that threatens global security and stability. The world’s response must be swift and exacting.

Putin’s actions reflect a willful disregard for international law and the lives of innocent people. They violate the basic principles underpinning the international system: that sovereign nations have the right to chart their own destiny and that borders cannot be changed by force. While being mindful of the risks of military escalation with a nuclear superpower, the U.S. and its allies should now take immediate, coordinated steps to isolate Putin and exert pressure on Russia’s economy.

Russia’s onslaught has been anticipated for months. Putin began to prepare the groundwork for escalation earlier this week with the recognition of two separatist self-proclaimed republics in eastern Ukraine, and a televised meeting that ensured high-ranking officials shared responsibility. On Thursday, he finally slammed the door on a peaceful resolution. Russia, he told citizens in a pre-dawn speech, could not feel safe with the “constant threat” from Ukraine and a “hardening” of NATO’s position. With its forces bearing down on Kyiv, the Kremlin says its objective is nothing less than the “liberation” of Ukraine.

After months of grappling with Putin’s strategic ambiguity and fretting over what would happen in the event of a “minor incursion,” the West now has the benefit of clarity. What, then, can the U.S. and its allies do to restrict Russia’s adventurism and protect civilians?

The West’s military options are limited. Russian forces possess overwhelming superiority over their Ukrainian counterparts. At this point, increasing lethal aid to Ukraine’s military is unlikely to prevent Putin’s annexation of parts of the country.

The U.S. and European governments should instead exploit their greatest strategic advantage over Putin — their economic power — and cut Russia off from the global financial system, with the aim of constraining Russia’s economy. In this regard, the actions already taken by the U.S., U.K. and E.U., while critical, will need to go much further. The U.S. sanctioned the company behind the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia to Germany, and Berlin, long hesitant, halted the landmark project. Additional sanctions have been put on sovereign debt, as well as oligarchs, parliamentarians and government officials, including Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.

On Thursday, the British government announced an asset freeze on all major Russian banks, blocked Russian companies from raising capital in U.K. markets, and imposed sanctions on some 100 members of the Russian elite. For his part, U.S. president Joe Biden sanctioned five major Russian banks holding $1 trillion in assets and moved to deprive Russia of the ability to import Western technology. If Putin’s offensive continues, the West should consider additional measures, including targeting Putin’s personal wealth.

Russia’s vast currency reserves, along with high energy prices and the support of China, will allow Putin to withstand the first wave of penalties. Europe’s dependence on Russian energy, made more intense by Germany’s shortsighted decision to close its nuclear plants, will likely threaten Western resolve. But the Russian economy is too small to sustain a war footing indefinitely. Though sanctions alone won’t dislodge Russian forces from Ukraine, patient and unstinting application of economic pressure remains the West’s most potent weapon for deterring further Russian aggression.

The West should be clear-eyed about the challenge it faces. Putin has exploited years of U.S. disengagement to sow chaos, divide NATO, and attempt to undo Europe’s post-Cold War order. Now he’s attacked a democratic European nation, a country with which his own people have deep ties and little desire to fight. A faltering response by the U.S. and its allies will only embolden others, notably China, to also attempt to advance their interests by force. This is no moment for weakness.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Minimum Support Price, or MSP?

After the Centre made a U-turn on agriculture laws, farmers hailed the government's decision to look into their demand to legalize Minimum Support Price or MSP. But what exactly is MSP?  Let's understand Minimum Support Price or MSP was introduced first by the Center in 1966-67. This was after India faced a major deficit in cereal production at the time of Independence. The less production was not able to meet the population's high demand. Consequently, in the wake of battling for more than 10 years, the public authority of India at long last chose to go for broad agrarian changes. As an initial move towards this rural transformation, the Minimum Support Price or MSP was presented. The Minimum Support Price or MSP is a wellbeing net for the ranchers as it runs after shielding them from the vulnerabilities of the market and of the regular kind. The presentation of the Minimum Support Price or MSP was a progressive advance for the rural business of India, which changed the c

Russia Vs Ukraine : Comparision of Military strength

Russia has mobilized a massive combat force – equipped with tanks, artillery, rockets etc, near its border with Ukraine. How do the two countries stack up on military capabilities?  In the wake of Russia’s troop build-up along the Ukraine border, here’s a comparison of Ukraine and Russia’s military strengths in 2022. Military expenditures

Netflix executive gets 2.5 years in prison

 A former Netflix executive was sentenced Tuesday to 2 and 1/2 years in federal prison for taking bribes and kickbacks from tech companies to approve lucrative contracts with the streaming giant. A former Netflix executive was sentenced Tuesday to 2 1/2 years in federal prison for taking bribes and kickbacks from tech companies to approve lucrative contracts with the streaming giant. Michael Kail, 52, of Los Gatos also was ordered to forfeit $700,000 and pay a $50,000 fine, the U.S. attorney's office said in a statement. Bribery and kickbacks are pernicious crimes that stifle Silicon Valley's culture of competitive innovation, acting U.S. Attorney Stephanie M. Hinds said in the statement. Kail is a former Netflix vice president who oversaw the company's internet technology department. Prosecutors alleged that Kail accepted more than $500,000 in kickbacks as well as valuable stock options in exchange for approving millions of dollars in contracts for nin